Contact
Implement · GLM

Can you run it?

Ownership levelPartialnone·limited·partial·substantial·fullAnalytical input C ยท 65.2/100

This page is a projection of the one entry record, the Doesn't fail you and Data control factors that Implement covers. The full verdict is set by all four factors together, floor-weighted so the weakest caps the whole.

Which domain expands which factor
  • AssessUse & modify + Transparency
  • ImplementData control + Doesn't fail you
  • UseDoesn't fail you
  • SupportTransparency

Install & run

GLM checkpoints are standard safetensors on the verified zai-org org. The MoE flagships serve best on vLLM or SGLang; the dense 0414 sizes also run under llama.cpp/Ollama. Always pin an exact revision.

# Hugging Face transformers (dense sizes)
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

model_id = "zai-org/GLM-4-32B-0414"   # pick the exact variant you assessed
rev = "<pinned-commit-sha>"            # pin the revision, don't float on main
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id, revision=rev)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id, revision=rev)
# vLLM (OpenAI-compatible server) - MoE flagships
vllm serve zai-org/GLM-4.6 --revision <sha>

# SGLang - also first-class for the MoE
python -m sglang.launch_server --model-path zai-org/GLM-4.6 --revision <sha>

# Ollama (community GGUF) - dense sizes
ollama run glm4

Also available on Zhipu's ModelScope; verify per-file checksums after download and confirm the LICENSE on the exact checkpoint.

Hardware & VRAM requirements

  • GLM-4-9B-0414 (dense) - runs on a single modern GPU.
  • GLM-4-32B-0414 (dense) - a single high-memory GPU (or dual GPU), heavier at long context.
  • GLM-4.5-Air (106B/12B MoE) - a multi-GPU node, or aggressive quantization on a single large card.
  • GLM-4.5 / GLM-4.6 (355B/32B MoE) - serious multi-GPU infrastructure, or heavy quantization, to serve at usable latency.

MoE total-parameter memory dominates even though only 32B are active per token, so size VRAM to the total, and budget extra headroom for the KV cache at the 200K context on GLM-4.6.

Serving stacks

StackUse it for
vLLMHigh-throughput MoE serving + OpenAI-compatible API
SGLangFirst-class MoE serving (agentic/structured workloads)
llama.cppCPU / edge / GGUF for the dense 0414 sizes
OllamaLocal single-command runs (dense sizes)
transformersPrototyping and fine-tuning

vLLM and SGLang are the primary paths for the 355B/106B MoE; day-0 llama.cpp/edge support is strongest for the dense sizes and lags for the big MoE. This breadth underpins Operational Readiness (4); it stops short of 5 mainly on the infrastructure weight of the largest MoE.

Safe-deployment controls & Deployment Ceiling

Applying the safe-deployment playbook, the model-specific gate rows are:

  • Supply chain: pin the exact zai-org revision and verify checksums (match across Hugging Face and ModelScope); confirm the per-checkpoint LICENSE - do not assume MIT everywhere.
  • Model layer: deploy the instruct checkpoints; set conservative decoding defaults.
  • Input/output layers: add input/output guardrails and your own guard classifier - GLM ships no companion guard model; add prompt-injection defences for agentic/coding paths and treat retrieved/tool content as untrusted.
  • Behaviour: test for China-aligned alignment and hosted-API-style moderation effects relevant to your use case.
  • Compliance: for the 355B MoE, resolve or avoid the EU systemic-risk / Article 55 question before EU high-stakes use; record your AI-BOM posture.

Deployment Ceiling: T3 (bounded autonomous) - conditional. With your own input/output guardrails, a guard model, and prompt-injection defences, GLM's coding/agentic strength supports bounded-autonomous use. T3 additionally needs a deterministic action-policy engine and per-action human approval for irreversible operations; the release itself provides none of this external tooling.

Available quantizations

Community GGUF (llama.cpp/Ollama), AWQ/GPTQ, and EXL quantizations circulate (bartowski, turboderp, and others) and are acknowledged, best-covered for the dense 0414 sizes. Coverage is marked partial because these are community efforts rather than a broad first-class official quantization program from Zhipu - verify the source and re-check quality before relying on a third-party quant in production, especially for the MoE flagships.

Fine-tuning & adaptation

The MIT-licensed safetensors checkpoints support standard SFT/LoRA via transformers / TRL, and released inference code eases integration. However, the training data and training pipeline are not released, so continued pre-training or reproduction from scratch is not possible - you can adapt the released weights, not rebuild them. Note the EU AI Act provider implications of placing a derivative on the EU market (see Assess).

API / OpenAI-compatible integration

Serve GLM behind vLLM's or SGLang's OpenAI-compatible /v1 server for a drop-in integration with existing OpenAI-client code:

vllm serve zai-org/GLM-4.6 --revision <sha> --port 8000
# then point any OpenAI SDK at http://localhost:8000/v1

No model-specific client is required - the chat-completions surface behaves like any other OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Account for GLM's chat template and its agentic/thinking output format when parsing responses.

How this scores

The ownership factors this domain covers, drawn from the one entry record.

3

Doesn't fail youIs it reliable and good enough for the job?

Moderate

Strong coding/agentic capability (GLM-4.6 is among the more capable open models on third-party evaluation), but safety tuning is lighter than Western frontier labs with no companion guard model, and the 355B MoE carries an unresolved EU systemic-risk question.

How this scores (AOI sub-dimensions)
Performance4/5how capable it is relative to its classStrong general capability and especially strong coding/agentic performance: third-party evaluation places GLM-4.6 among the more capable open models for real-world coding and tool use.
Operational4/5how practical it is to run, serve and maintain in productionStrong ecosystem support: dual distribution on Hugging Face and ModelScope, first-class vLLM and SGLang serving, community GGUF quants, and a size range from a 9B dense model to the 355B MoE.
Safety3/5whether misuse risks are evaluated and guardrails are providedInstruct variants are safety-tuned and withstand casual jailbreaks, but tuning is lighter than Western frontier labs, there is no companion guard model, the hosted API applies Chinese content moderation, and the models carry China-aligned alignment - behavioural factors to account for.
4

Doesn't extract your dataDoes running it keep your knowledge and data yours?

Strong

Self-hosted, the MIT-licensed weights run on your own infrastructure and nothing phones home - your data and derived knowledge stay yours. The hosted Z.ai API is the only path that exposes inputs, and it is a Singapore regime (not PRC): API content is 'not saved on our servers' and not used to train unless you agree, though consumer chat content is used to improve the models.

How this scores
Not a scored AOI dimension. For a self-hosted model, data-control is a structural property of running the weights yourself, strong by default unless the model phones home or the licence claws back rights. For a hosted API this factor is the retention + train-on-inputs + residency read, scored from the binding terms.
What this means for adoptionYou substantially - but not uniformly - own the GLM line, and the split is per-variant. The current line is genuine MIT: GLM-5.2 ships a real checked-in MIT LICENSE ('Copyright (c) 2026 Zhipu AI') and the GLM-4.5/4.6 and GLM-4-0414 siblings declare the same MIT via HF metadata/README, so you can run, fine-tune, distill, redistribute and commercialise them with no gate. The caveat is the legacy glm-4-9b - NOT plain MIT but a custom 'glm-4' licence requiring commercial-use registration, 'Built with glm-4' attribution and a name prefix, governed by PRC law with disputes to Beijing's Haidian District court - so verify the LICENSE per checkpoint. Two things hold it at partial: training is opaque (closed data/code, China-aligned alignment you cannot inspect) and no safety battery is benchmarked, so supply your own guards. Mind the jurisdiction split too - the weights you self-host are yours, but the hosted Z.ai service is Singapore-governed (SIAC arbitration), a different legal regime from the PRC glm-4-9b weights licence; do not conflate the two.

Sources

The same evidence records as the entry sheet. Read means the text was verified; unverified means it is known to exist but not yet read.

Model cardread2026-07-25
GLM-4.6 is a 355B-total / 32B-active MoE with a 200K context window, released by Zhipu AI / Z.ai and hosted on the zai-org Hugging Face org; the model card/metadata declares MIT.
Model cardread2026-07-25
GLM-4.5 (355B/32B) and GLM-4.5-Air (106B/12B) are MoE models on the zai-org Hugging Face org; the GLM-4.5 README states "They are released under the MIT open-source license and can be used commercially and for secondary development."
Model cardread2026-07-25
GLM checkpoints are hosted on the verified zai-org org on Hugging Face in safetensors with checksums (the current org; legacy checkpoints are under THUDM).
Licenceread2026-07-25
The GLM-4.5, GLM-4.6 and GLM-4-32B-0414 checkpoints declare the OSI-approved MIT license permitting commercial use - but via HF metadata ("License: mit") and README only; there is NO in-repo LICENSE file (raw/blob LICENSE returns 404).
Licenceread2026-07-25
GLM-5.2 ships a REAL in-repo MIT LICENSE file, read verbatim: standard MIT text with no custom clauses, "Copyright (c) 2026 Zhipu AI." This resolves the metadata-only gap on the 4.5/4.6/0414 line by confirming the family MIT is a genuine, checked-in MIT licence on at least one current sibling.
Licenceread2026-07-25
Licensing is per-variant and the legacy glm-4-9b is NOT plain MIT.
Documentationunverified2026-07-25
The GLM-4-0414 family (dense GLM-4-32B-0414 and GLM-4-9B-0414, up to 128K extended context) was open-sourced under the MIT license.
Documentationunverified2026-07-25
Zhipu / Z.ai publishes GLM inference code and technical reports on GitHub (zai-org/GLM-4, zai-org/GLM-4.5), but not the training data or training pipeline.
Model cardunverified2026-07-25
GLM models are also officially published on Alibaba's ModelScope hub (dual distribution) by Zhipu.
Terms of serviceread2026-07-25
Hosted Z.ai Terms of Service, read verbatim: governed by Singapore law with SIAC arbitration (seat Singapore).
Privacy Policyread2026-07-25
Hosted Z.ai Privacy Policy, read verbatim: data is processed in Singapore; API content is "not saved on our servers"; consumer content is used "when we train and improve our models." The Singapore processing location is distinct from the PRC jurisdiction of the glm-4-9b weights licence.
Third-party analysisunverified2026-07-25
Third-party evaluation places GLM-4.6 among the stronger open models for real-world coding, tool use and agentic tasks.
Third-party analysisunverified2026-07-25
GLM models carry China-aligned alignment and the hosted Z.ai API applies Chinese content moderation on politically sensitive topics.
Third-party analysisunverified2026-07-25
GLM is supported for local serving on vLLM and SGLang (with community GGUF quants for the dense sizes) and distributed across Hugging Face and ModelScope.
Third-party analysisunverified2026-07-25
GLM instruct variants are safety-tuned but with lighter alignment coverage than Western frontier labs and no companion guard model.
Model cardunverified2026-07-25
No public EU AI Act training-content summary, copyright policy, or Article 55 documentation is published for GLM, and the 355B MoE's systemic-risk status is unconfirmed.